BAHR Dispute Resolution Insight 2026
This is a special edition that coincides with an exciting milestone: the opening of our offices in Stockholm and Copenhagen. With teams now across Norway, Sweden and Denmark. The articles in this edition reflect that spirit, bringing a comparative Scandinavian perspective to some of the most pressing issues in international arbitration and dispute resolution.
- ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐๐จ๐๐๐ซ๐ง๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ข๐๐ง ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ญ: Our Dispute Resolution team makes the case for targeted, incremental reform of Norwegian arbitration legislation, which is now approaching a quarter-century without a major update. From confidentiality protections and emergency arbitration to early dismissal procedures, we examine how Norway can close the gap with leading arbitral centres such as London, Singapore, and Stockholm.
- ๐๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐-๐๐๐ซ๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐ ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐๐ฒ๐จ๐ง๐: Once a legal curiosity, third-party funding has matured into a multi-billion-dollar industry reshaping how disputes are financed. This article maps the regulatory landscape across Norway and Sweden, unpacks what funders look for, and highlights the key considerations for parties and practitioners navigating this evolving space.
- ๐๐จ๐จ๐ค๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ โ ๐๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ฐ๐๐ฒ’๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐ข๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฐ: Through a deep dive into three landmark Supreme Court decisions, this article traces Norway’s journey from a parochial arbitration culture to one that actively engages with international best practice and a denationalised approach, exploring what this means for Norway’s future as an arbitral seat.
We hope you enjoy this edition and we welcome any thoughts or questions you may have.
Share aticle to